Update: I’ve taken the plunge on the 350D. To check out some sample images, check out the posts filed under photography.
As many of you know, I’m currently saving for my first digital SLR. I’m not sure when I’ll be purchasing it, but the advice I get from this post might determine how much longer it will take me to save. My question is, 350D or 400D?
The RRP of the 400D in New Zealand is $1799.00, and the 350D, $1299.
Main differences (400D on left, 350D on right):
- 10MP – 8MP
- 27 continuous JPEG shots – 14 continuous JPEG shots
- 9 Point Autofocus – 7 Point Autofocus
Those are pretty much the main 3 factors that actually bother me. 99% of the photos taken with my DSLR wont end up printed, so the MP issue can almost be crossed out.
I plan to get into cricket photography, but I wont be taking “bursts” of more than 5 shots at a time at matches, so the continuous shooting isn’t too much of an issue.
Autofocus? I don’t know enough about this to post my views.
So, is it worth saving at least $500 NZD by purchasing the Canon EOS 350D in order to get my camera quicker?
Update: I’ve taken the plunge on the 350D. Thanks for the advice!